PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FGMNX vs. CLDAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FGMNX and CLDAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

70.00%75.00%80.00%85.00%90.00%95.00%100.00%105.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
74.25%
95.00%
FGMNX
CLDAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FGMNX:

0.17

CLDAX:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

FGMNX:

0.27

CLDAX:

0.68

Omega Ratio

FGMNX:

1.03

CLDAX:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

FGMNX:

0.09

CLDAX:

0.13

Martin Ratio

FGMNX:

0.48

CLDAX:

1.35

Ulcer Index

FGMNX:

2.04%

CLDAX:

1.87%

Daily Std Dev

FGMNX:

5.85%

CLDAX:

5.42%

Max Drawdown

FGMNX:

-16.62%

CLDAX:

-23.91%

Current Drawdown

FGMNX:

-7.29%

CLDAX:

-14.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGMNX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than CLDAX's 1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FGMNX has underperformed CLDAX with an annualized return of 0.68%, while CLDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.88% annualized return.


FGMNX

YTD

0.59%

1M

-0.60%

6M

0.51%

1Y

1.59%

5Y*

-0.66%

10Y*

0.68%

CLDAX

YTD

1.57%

1M

-0.08%

6M

1.49%

1Y

2.39%

5Y*

-0.57%

10Y*

1.88%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGMNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CLDAX's 0.74% expense ratio.


CLDAX
Calvert Core Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for CLDAX: current value at 0.74% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.74%
Expense ratio chart for FGMNX: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FGMNX, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.170.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for FGMNX, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.270.60
The chart of Omega ratio for FGMNX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.031.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for FGMNX, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.090.12
The chart of Martin ratio for FGMNX, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.481.17
FGMNX
CLDAX

The current FGMNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the CLDAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGMNX and CLDAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.17
0.41
FGMNX
CLDAX

Dividends

FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Dividend Comparison

FGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than CLDAX's 4.51% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
3.29%3.45%1.99%0.74%1.61%2.46%2.19%2.18%2.08%2.41%2.12%2.48%
CLDAX
Calvert Core Bond Fund
4.51%3.87%2.19%1.39%2.53%3.05%3.62%3.03%3.13%2.85%3.00%3.58%

Drawdowns

FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGMNX drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum CLDAX drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGMNX and CLDAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-7.29%
-14.78%
FGMNX
CLDAX

Volatility

FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) have volatilities of 1.61% and 1.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.61%
1.57%
FGMNX
CLDAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab