FGMNX vs. CLDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX).
FGMNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 8, 1985. CLDAX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Dec 30, 2004.
Performance
FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGMNX Fidelity GNMA Fund | 0.46% | 7.89% | 0.43% | 5.46% | -11.52% | -1.03% | 3.74% | 5.72% | 0.62% | 1.74% |
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund | -0.71% | 7.27% | 1.39% | 5.04% | -13.48% | -2.30% | 14.56% | 20.77% | -5.73% | 9.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGMNX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than CLDAX's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FGMNX has underperformed CLDAX with an annualized return of 1.22%, while CLDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.26% annualized return.
FGMNX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.22%
CLDAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGMNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CLDAX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGMNX vs. CLDAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGMNX
CLDAX
FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGMNX | CLDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.89 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.27 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.40 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 4.35 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGMNX | CLDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.89 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | -0.03 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.48 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.82 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGMNX and CLDAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Dividend Comparison
FGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than CLDAX's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGMNX Fidelity GNMA Fund | 3.30% | 3.61% | 3.23% | 3.45% | 1.68% | 0.76% | 1.61% | 2.46% | 2.19% | 2.17% | 2.61% | 2.25% |
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund | 3.90% | 4.24% | 4.16% | 3.17% | 1.80% | 6.08% | 5.22% | 3.04% | 3.63% | 3.02% | 7.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGMNX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum CLDAX drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGMNX and CLDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGMNX | CLDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -18.88% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -3.04% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.62% | -18.21% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.84% | -18.88% | +2.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -4.11% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -3.92% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.98% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FGMNX vs. CLDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) is 1.50%, while Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that FGMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGMNX | CLDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 1.60% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.56% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 4.27% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 5.59% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 6.85% | -2.20% |