FGMNX vs. FADMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FGMNX (Fidelity GNMA Fund) and FADMX (Fidelity Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FGMNX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FADMX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FGMNX returned 0.33%/yr vs 3.26%/yr for FADMX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGMNX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FADMX.

Performance

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGMNX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.46% return.

FGMNX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 5.94%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: 1.23%

FADMX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 3.46%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 9.63%
• 3Y*: 8.14%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGMNX Fidelity GNMA Fund	1.09%	7.89%	0.43%	5.46%	-11.52%	-1.03%	3.74%	5.72%	2.60%
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	3.46%	9.01%	6.02%	9.55%	-11.84%	3.46%	6.72%	11.06%	-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FGMNX and FADMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018	0.64

The correlation between FGMNX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGMNX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGMNX

FGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 38
FGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FADMX

FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGMNX	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	2.66	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	3.99	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.56	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	3.69	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.33	16.01	-8.68

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGMNX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGMNX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGMNX and FADMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGMNX	FADMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.84%	-15.98%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-2.62%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.23%	-3.99%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.50%	-15.98%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	0.00%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-3.05%	+1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	0.60%	+0.23%

Volatility

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) is 1.22%, while Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that FGMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGMNX	FADMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	1.41%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	3.08%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	3.63%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.26%	4.54%	+1.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	4.77%	-0.09%

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGMNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than FADMX's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	4.28%	4.33%	4.16%	4.31%	2.91%	4.23%	3.82%	4.34%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FGMNX Fidelity GNMA Fund	3.62%	3.61%	3.23%	3.45%	1.68%	0.76%	1.61%	2.46%	2.19%	2.17%	2.61%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGMNX and FADMX in my portfolio?

FGMNX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGMNX or FADMX?

FADMX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to FGMNX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGMNX dropped -16.84% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.