PortfoliosLab logo
FGMNX vs. FADMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FGMNX and FADMX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FGMNX:

0.93

FADMX:

1.58

Sortino Ratio

FGMNX:

1.50

FADMX:

2.39

Omega Ratio

FGMNX:

1.18

FADMX:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

FGMNX:

0.53

FADMX:

1.64

Martin Ratio

FGMNX:

2.52

FADMX:

6.19

Ulcer Index

FGMNX:

2.17%

FADMX:

0.99%

Daily Std Dev

FGMNX:

5.50%

FADMX:

3.81%

Max Drawdown

FGMNX:

-16.62%

FADMX:

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

FGMNX:

-4.65%

FADMX:

-0.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGMNX achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than FADMX's 1.31% return.


FGMNX

YTD

2.11%

1M

-0.10%

6M

1.43%

1Y

5.15%

5Y*

-0.84%

10Y*

0.89%

FADMX

YTD

1.31%

1M

1.82%

6M

0.71%

1Y

6.04%

5Y*

3.54%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGMNX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGMNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGMNX vs. FADMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGMNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGMNX is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGMNX is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGMNX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGMNX is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGMNX is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGMNX is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FADMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FADMX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FADMX is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FADMX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FADMX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FADMX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FADMX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FGMNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGMNX and FADMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than FADMX's 4.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
3.53%3.83%3.45%1.99%0.74%1.61%2.46%2.19%2.18%2.08%2.41%2.12%
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
4.13%4.21%4.32%3.67%2.75%3.33%3.46%2.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGMNX drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FADMX drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGMNX and FADMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FGMNX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...