PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFSYX vs. GSCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) and GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFSYX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than GSCYX's 17.55% return.


GFSYX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.45%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*

GSCYX

1D
0.75%
1M
4.27%
YTD
17.55%
6M
15.25%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
1.00%5.49%7.60%5.98%-0.57%4.96%-0.17%4.94%0.14%1.20%
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
17.55%6.03%10.58%14.91%-17.84%22.04%20.07%25.28%-12.62%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GFSYX and GSCYX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017

0.12

The correlation between GFSYX and GSCYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFSYX vs. GSCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFSYX
GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GSCYX
GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) and GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFSYXGSCYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.92

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

10.82

-2.77

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFSYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the GSCYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFSYX and GSCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFSYX drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum GSCYX drawdown of -63.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFSYX and GSCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFSYXGSCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-63.53%

+53.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.34%

-11.07%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.49%

-26.51%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.49%

-33.95%

+29.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-15.12%

+14.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

2.98%

-2.42%

Volatility

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) is 0.89%, while GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that GFSYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFSYXGSCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

5.85%

-4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.92%

13.58%

-11.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57%

18.27%

-15.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

23.58%

-19.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.71%

23.37%

-19.66%

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFSYX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GSCYX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFSYX vs. GSCYX - Dividend Comparison

GFSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than GSCYX's 9.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
7.10%7.18%8.54%13.00%4.20%1.59%1.53%2.24%2.17%0.70%0.00%0.00%
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
9.62%11.30%6.14%2.65%5.13%16.30%1.07%3.87%24.79%7.81%1.46%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFSYX and GSCYX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSCYX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to GFSYX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFSYX dropped -9.54% vs GSCYX's -63.53%.

GSCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFSYX and GSCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer