PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFRIX vs. SAMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFRIX achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than SAMBX's 2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GFRIX has underperformed SAMBX with an annualized return of 4.29%, while SAMBX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.68% annualized return.


GFRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
4.29%

SAMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.69%
6M
3.96%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
4.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
1.29%4.07%7.44%10.49%-3.02%4.36%2.52%11.06%-1.32%3.43%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.69%5.88%7.03%11.21%-0.86%4.86%0.41%6.66%0.24%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GFRIX and SAMBX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.66

The correlation between GFRIX and SAMBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFRIX vs. SAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFRIX
GFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMBX
SAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFRIXSAMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

2.22

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

9.56

-6.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

30.52

-21.47

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the SAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFRIX and SAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFRIXSAMBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

3.06

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.50

1.89

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

1.19

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

1.20

-0.07

Drawdowns

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, smaller than the maximum SAMBX drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFRIX and SAMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFRIXSAMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.14%

-24.74%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-0.78%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.42%

-2.95%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.70%

-5.66%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.14%

-20.91%

-2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-1.58%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.24%

+0.22%

Volatility

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFRIXSAMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.65%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

1.79%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

2.44%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.86%

2.95%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

3.94%

+0.26%

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFRIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SAMBX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFRIX vs. SAMBX - Dividend Comparison

GFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, less than SAMBX's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
7.07%7.15%7.63%7.13%4.79%3.41%4.19%6.77%4.73%4.00%4.18%4.12%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.42%7.78%8.21%8.21%5.34%3.03%4.03%5.28%5.15%4.28%4.79%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFRIX and SAMBX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMBX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to GFRIX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFRIX dropped -23.14% vs SAMBX's -24.74%.

SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFRIX and SAMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer