PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFRIX vs. PYFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFRIX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than PYFRX's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GFRIX has underperformed PYFRX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while PYFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.99% annualized return.


GFRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.12%
6M
1.08%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
4.15%
ALL TIME*
4.06%

PYFRX

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.49%
6M
2.35%
YTD
2.25%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
4.99%
ALL TIME*
4.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
1.17%4.07%7.44%10.49%-3.02%4.36%2.52%11.06%-1.32%3.43%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
2.25%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%0.31%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GFRIX and PYFRX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.55

The correlation between GFRIX and PYFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFRIX vs. PYFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFRIX
GFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFRIXPYFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

2.39

-1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

5.46

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

22.82

-16.55

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the PYFRX Sharpe Ratio of 4.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFRIX and PYFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, which is greater than PYFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFRIX and PYFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFRIXPYFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.14%

-20.18%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-0.97%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.42%

-2.66%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.70%

-4.80%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.14%

-20.18%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.03%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-0.58%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.23%

+0.24%

Volatility

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) is 0.30%, while Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) has a volatility of 0.32%. This indicates that GFRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFRIXPYFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.32%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

1.07%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

1.25%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.87%

1.95%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.19%

3.62%

+0.57%

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFRIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PYFRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFRIX vs. PYFRX - Dividend Comparison

GFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than PYFRX's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
6.47%7.15%7.63%7.13%4.79%3.41%4.19%6.77%4.73%4.00%4.18%4.12%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
6.98%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFRIX and PYFRX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYFRX has higher volatility (0.32%) compared to GFRIX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFRIX dropped -23.14% vs PYFRX's -20.18%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFRIX and PYFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer