PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFRIX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFRIX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 3.43% return.


GFRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.40%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
4.29%

GSIMX

1D
-0.94%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
3.43%
6M
4.22%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
0.93%4.07%7.44%10.49%-3.02%4.36%2.52%11.06%-1.32%3.43%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
3.43%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GFRIX and GSIMX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.24

The correlation between GFRIX and GSIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFRIX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFRIX
GFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFRIXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.19

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.29

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

4.01

+4.43

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFRIX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, smaller than the maximum GSIMX drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFRIX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFRIXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.14%

-28.84%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-7.81%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.42%

-10.32%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.70%

-25.37%

+18.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-6.44%

+6.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-4.81%

+3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

2.50%

-2.04%

Volatility

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) is 0.67%, while Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that GFRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFRIXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

2.79%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

8.25%

-6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

9.88%

-7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.86%

14.37%

-11.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.19%

15.68%

-11.49%

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFRIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFRIX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

GFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than GSIMX's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
7.09%7.15%7.63%7.13%4.79%3.41%4.19%6.77%4.73%4.00%4.18%4.12%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.95%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFRIX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIMX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to GFRIX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFRIX dropped -23.14% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

GFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFRIX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer