GFOF vs. IREG
GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while IREG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. GFOF is passively managed, while IREG is actively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IREG.
Performance
GFOF vs. IREG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IREG
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 56.03%
- YTD
- 76.42%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF vs. IREG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 76.42% | 3.65% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. IREG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFOF | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.33 | — |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. IREG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -80.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -29.69% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -44.09% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. IREG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 208.00% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 208.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 208.00% | — |
GFOF vs. IREG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than IREG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFOF vs. IREG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFOF nor IREG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GFOF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GFOF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IREG.
GFOF and IREG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while IREG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.75% for IREG.
Find the right allocation for GFOF and IREG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer