PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFOF vs. CBXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GFOF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBXJ

1D
-0.85%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
-11.67%
6M
-12.37%
1Y
-21.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFOF vs. CBXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFOF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CBXJ
CBXJ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CBXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CBXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFOFCBXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.17

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFOFCBXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.30%

Volatility

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFOFCBXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXJ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFOF vs. CBXJ - Dividend Comparison

GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CBXJ
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
2.23%1.97%0.00%0.00%
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%2.55%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CBXJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBXJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.69% for CBXJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFOF and CBXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer