GFOF vs. CBXJ
GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds. GFOF is passively managed, while CBXJ is actively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXJ.
Performance
GFOF vs. CBXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXJ
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -10.13%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- 1Y
- -20.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF vs. CBXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -10.13% | -7.64% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. CBXJ — Risk / Return Rank
GFOF
CBXJ
GFOF vs. CBXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFOF | CBXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.79 | — |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. CBXJ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | CBXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -28.02% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.68% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.11% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. CBXJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | CBXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.94% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.71% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.71% | — |
GFOF vs. CBXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFOF vs. CBXJ - Dividend Comparison
GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 2.19% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CBXJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.69% for CBXJ.
Find the right allocation for GFOF and CBXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer