CBXJ vs. CBTJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds from Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CBXJ returned -21.37% vs -31.54% for CBTJ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXJ achieves a -11.67% return, which is significantly higher than CBTJ's -19.03% return.

CBXJ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -11.67%
• 6M: -12.37%
• 1Y: -21.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBTJ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -10.16%
• YTD: -19.03%
• 6M: -20.42%
• 1Y: -31.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-11.67%	-7.64%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-19.03%	-11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CBXJ and CBTJ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.99

The correlation between CBXJ and CBTJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CBXJ vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXJ

CBXJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CBXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBXJ	CBTJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.21	-1.17	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	-1.67	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	0.81	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	-0.77	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	-1.25	+0.08

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBXJ Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is comparable to the CBTJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBXJ and CBTJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXJ drawdown since its inception was -29.25%, smaller than the maximum CBTJ drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXJ and CBTJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBXJ	CBTJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.25%	-40.98%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.25%	-40.98%	+11.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.25%	-40.91%	+11.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.33%	-16.03%	+4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.30%	25.32%	-7.02%

Volatility

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) is 3.06%, while Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that CBXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBXJ	CBTJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	5.30%	-2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	18.24%	-6.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.78%	27.04%	-9.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.49%	25.36%	-8.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	25.36%	-8.87%

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBXJ and CBTJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CBXJ vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison

CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than CBTJ's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.79%	1.45%
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	2.23%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBXJ and CBTJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, CBXJ and CBTJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CBXJ or CBTJ?

CBTJ has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to CBXJ (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBXJ dropped -29.25% vs CBTJ's -40.98%.

Which ETF is better, CBXJ or CBTJ?

On 1-year performance, CBXJ leads with -21.37% vs -31.54% for CBTJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CBXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBXJ or CBTJ?

Over the 1-year period, CBXJ has performed better with a -21.37% return vs -31.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBXJ or CBTJ?

CBXJ and CBTJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBXJ or CBTJ?

CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.79% for CBTJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.17 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.