PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFI vs. VRNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GFI vs. VRNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Verona Pharma plc (VRNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GFI

1D
-2.02%
1M
-20.02%
YTD
-15.43%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
51.45%
3Y*
36.70%
5Y*
31.29%
10Y*
26.67%

VRNA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFI vs. VRNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-15.43%240.42%-6.27%44.90%-2.61%23.33%43.02%89.47%-16.75%27.15%
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%130.21%133.60%-23.92%288.84%-4.00%21.74%-40.41%-18.71%-12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and VRNA is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2017

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFI:

$32.09B

VRNA:

$9.72B

EPS

GFI:

$5.39

VRNA:

-$0.69

PS Ratio

GFI:

2.30

VRNA:

57.97

PB Ratio

GFI:

3.81

VRNA:

34.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFI:

$13.98B

VRNA:

$167.65M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFI:

$7.34B

VRNA:

$159.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

GFI:

$8.04B

VRNA:

-$40.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFI vs. VRNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VRNA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFI vs. VRNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Verona Pharma plc (VRNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFIVRNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

GFI vs. VRNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFIVRNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

Drawdowns

GFI vs. VRNA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFIVRNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.69%

Volatility

GFI vs. VRNA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFIVRNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.86%

Dividends

GFI vs. VRNA - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, while VRNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
5.13%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GFI vs. VRNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Verona Pharma plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
5.29B
75.14M
(GFI) Total Revenue
(VRNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GFI vs. VRNA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gold Fields Limited and Verona Pharma plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
56.7%
95.4%
Portfolio components
GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

VRNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a gross profit of 71.68M and revenue of 75.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.4%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

VRNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported an operating income of 9.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

VRNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a net income of 8.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GFI and VRNA have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFI and VRNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer