GFI vs. SCR.PA
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and SCR.PA (SCOR SE) are both stocks. GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while SCR.PA operates in Insurance - Reinsurance (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GFI returned 27.45%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for SCR.PA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFI vs. SCR.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GFI is traded in USD, while SCR.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SCR.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCR.PA's 13.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed SCR.PA with an annualized return of 27.45%, while SCR.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.32% annualized return.
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -17.25%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 47.65%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
SCR.PA
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
GFI vs. SCR.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
SCR.PA SCOR SE | 13.13% | 47.53% | -10.68% | 34.54% | -21.25% | 3.53% | -23.15% | -2.46% | 17.48% | 22.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and SCR.PA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.11 |
The correlation between GFI and SCR.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. SCR.PA — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
SCR.PA
GFI vs. SCR.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and SCOR SE (SCR.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFI | SCR.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 0.81 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 2.06 | +1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFI vs. SCR.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than SCR.PA's maximum drawdown of -67.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and SCR.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | SCR.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -67.14% | -20.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.90% | -20.00% | -23.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.90% | -43.62% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -59.54% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -67.14% | +4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.93% | -6.26% | -32.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -16.63% | -27.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 7.93% | +8.58% |
Volatility
GFI vs. SCR.PA - Volatility Comparison
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 17.70% compared to SCOR SE (SCR.PA) at 6.21%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCR.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | SCR.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.70% | 6.21% | +11.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 17.29% | +29.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.94% | 25.73% | +34.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.37% | 35.38% | +16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.90% | 34.73% | +20.17% |
Dividends
GFI vs. SCR.PA - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than SCR.PA's 6.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
SCR.PA SCOR SE | 6.12% | 6.26% | 7.61% | 5.29% | 8.38% | 6.56% | 0.00% | 4.68% | 4.19% | 4.92% | 4.57% | 4.06% |
Financials
GFI vs. SCR.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and SCOR SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and SCR.PA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GFI and SCR.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer