GFI vs. MRVL
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while MRVL operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, GFI returned 22.89%/yr vs 38.11%/yr for MRVL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFI vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -19.53% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 177.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 22.89%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 38.11% annualized return.
GFI
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- 6M
- -23.10%
- YTD
- -19.53%
- 1Y
- 47.03%
- 3Y*
- 40.04%
- 5Y*
- 34.68%
- 10Y*
- 22.89%
MRVL
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -15.97%
- 6M
- 183.57%
- YTD
- 177.90%
- 1Y
- 225.01%
- 3Y*
- 56.45%
- 5Y*
- 33.34%
- 10Y*
- 38.11%
GFI vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -19.53% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 177.90% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and MRVL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.13 |
The correlation between GFI and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFI:
$30.56B
MRVL:
$206.29B
GFI:
$5.39
MRVL:
$2.90
GFI:
6.33
MRVL:
81.42
GFI:
0.10
MRVL:
0.15
GFI:
2.18
MRVL:
23.60
GFI:
3.62
MRVL:
11.56
GFI:
$13.98B
MRVL:
$8.72B
GFI:
$7.34B
MRVL:
$4.41B
GFI:
$8.04B
MRVL:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
MRVL
GFI vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFI | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 8.26 | -7.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 18.47 | -16.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFI vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, roughly equal to the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -91.60% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.66% | -27.09% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.66% | -60.79% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -61.88% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -61.88% | -1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.88% | -25.46% | -17.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -46.65% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.83% | 12.10% | +7.73% |
Volatility
GFI vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is 19.88%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 30.44%. This indicates that GFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.88% | 30.44% | -10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.77% | 60.87% | -13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.30% | 74.57% | -13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.77% | 62.94% | -10.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.77% | 52.52% | +2.25% |
Dividends
GFI vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than MRVL's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.39% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.10% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
Financials
GFI vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFI vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and MRVL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (30.44%) compared to GFI (19.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs MRVL's -91.60%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFI and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer