PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFI vs. ECHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GFI vs. ECHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and EchoStar Corporation (ECHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GFI

1D
0.81%
1M
-15.73%
YTD
-20.82%
6M
-21.65%
1Y
47.59%
3Y*
38.88%
5Y*
34.54%
10Y*
23.74%

ECHO

1D
0.65%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFI vs. ECHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-3.00%
ECHO
EchoStar Corporation
-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and ECHO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2026

0.03

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFI vs. ECHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ECHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFI vs. ECHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and EchoStar Corporation (ECHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFIECHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

GFI vs. ECHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFI vs. ECHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than ECHO's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and ECHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFIECHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.05%

-6.48%

-81.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.80%

-2.33%

-41.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.24%

-3.67%

-40.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.50%

Volatility

GFI vs. ECHO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFIECHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.34%

42.51%

+18.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.73%

42.51%

+10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.80%

42.51%

+12.29%

Dividends

GFI vs. ECHO - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, while ECHO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECHO
EchoStar Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
5.48%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%

Financials

GFI vs. ECHO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and EchoStar Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
5.29B
(GFI) Total Revenue
(ECHO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GFI and ECHO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFI and ECHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer