GFI vs. BVN
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and BVN (Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — GFI in Gold, BVN in Other Precious Metals & Mining. Over the past 10 years, GFI returned 27.45%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for BVN. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GFI vs. BVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly lower than BVN's 23.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed BVN with an annualized return of 27.45%, while BVN has yielded a comparatively lower 13.54% annualized return.
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
BVN
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -13.13%
- YTD
- 23.58%
- 6M
- 22.13%
- 1Y
- 105.88%
- 3Y*
- 70.14%
- 5Y*
- 27.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
GFI vs. BVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
BVN Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. | 23.58% | 147.96% | -24.06% | 106.47% | 2.47% | -39.95% | -19.27% | -6.40% | 15.91% | 25.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and BVN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GFI and BVN shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFI:
$32.65B
BVN:
$8.49B
GFI:
$5.39
BVN:
$3.84
GFI:
6.78
BVN:
8.69
GFI:
0.11
BVN:
0.02
GFI:
2.34
BVN:
4.15
GFI:
3.87
BVN:
2.05
GFI:
$13.98B
BVN:
$2.05B
GFI:
$7.34B
BVN:
$1.06B
GFI:
$8.04B
BVN:
$1.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. BVN — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
BVN
GFI vs. BVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFI | BVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.48 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 8.76 | -5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFI vs. BVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, smaller than the maximum BVN drawdown of -93.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and BVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | BVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -93.68% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.90% | -30.64% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.90% | -38.30% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -53.67% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -70.15% | +7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.93% | -31.25% | -7.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -46.40% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 12.13% | +4.38% |
Volatility
GFI vs. BVN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is 17.70%, while Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) has a volatility of 20.09%. This indicates that GFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | BVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.70% | 20.09% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 42.55% | +3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.94% | 50.28% | +9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.37% | 45.80% | +6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.90% | 45.95% | +8.95% |
Dividends
GFI vs. BVN - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than BVN's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVN Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. | 3.40% | 1.57% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
GFI vs. BVN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFI vs. BVN - Profitability Comparison
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
BVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a gross profit of 356.89M and revenue of 622.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.3%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
BVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported an operating income of 325.55M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.3%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
BVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a net income of 334.26M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in a net margin of 53.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and BVN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BVN has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to GFI (17.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs BVN's -93.68%.
BVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFI and BVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer