GFGF vs. GXLC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GFGF is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GFGF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

GFGF vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 11.54% return.

GFGF

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 0.77%
• 6M: 3.26%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 1Y: 12.91%
• 3Y*: 17.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.58%

GXLC

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 9.67%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	$419.66K	$205.13K	$80.27K
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	$25.69K	$21.89K	$18.29K

GFGF vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	2.78%	5.32%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	11.54%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GFGF and GXLC is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

GFGF vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFGF

GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 34
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 31

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFGF vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFGF	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.87	—	—

Drawdowns

GFGF vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFGF	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.98%	-9.08%	-18.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.16%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.04%	-1.57%	-6.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFGF	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.92%	13.64%	-0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	13.64%	+5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	13.64%	+5.29%

GFGF vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFGF vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than GXLC's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	0.21%	0.21%	0.10%	0.08%	0.42%	0.01%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.63%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFGF and GXLC in my portfolio?

GFGF and GXLC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GFGF or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFGF or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GFGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFGF or GXLC?

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.21% for GFGF.

What is the main difference between GFGF and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: GuruFocus and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GFGF and 0.02% for GXLC.