GFGF vs. FTIF
GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GFGF is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GFGF returned 16.15%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for FTIF. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFGF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
GFGF vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 20.97% return.
GFGF
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -2.37%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTIF
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 20.97%
- 6M
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFGF vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF | -1.94% | 13.11% | 26.12% | 24.33% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 20.97% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFGF and FTIF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.46 |
The correlation between GFGF and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GFGF vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GFGF
FTIF
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GFGF
FTIF
Financial Services
GFGF
FTIF
-
Healthcare
GFGF
FTIF
-
Communication Services
GFGF
FTIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
GFGF
FTIF
Consumer Defensive
GFGF
FTIF
-
Industrials
GFGF
FTIF
Real Estate
GFGF
FTIF
Basic Materials
GFGF
-
FTIF
Energy
GFGF
-
FTIF
Utilities
GFGF
-
FTIF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFGF vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
GFGF
FTIF
GFGF vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFGF | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 5.47 | -4.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 15.23 | -13.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFGF vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFGF | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.98% | -27.83% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -5.46% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | -27.83% | +12.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -4.32% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -5.95% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 1.96% | +2.50% |
Volatility
GFGF vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is 4.03%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that GFGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFGF | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.57% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 10.75% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 15.38% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 18.92% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 18.92% | +0.13% |
GFGF vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFGF vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FTIF's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.15% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.42% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFGF and FTIF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTIF has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to GFGF (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFGF dropped -27.98% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 3-year performance, GFGF leads with 16.15% vs 14.08% for FTIF. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GFGF has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GFGF has performed better with a 16.15% return vs 14.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GFGF.
FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.22% for GFGF.
They also come from different issuers: GuruFocus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GFGF and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFGF and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer