PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFEB vs. DNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFEB vs. DNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFEB vs. DNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GFEB
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February
-1.06%11.19%13.06%13.76%
DNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November
-1.91%13.93%10.71%15.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFEB achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly higher than DNOV's -1.91% return.


GFEB

1D
1.58%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
1.28%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
10Y*

DNOV

1D
1.46%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
2.32%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GFEB vs. DNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GFEB and DNOV have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

GFEB vs. DNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFEB
GFEB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DNOV
DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFEB vs. DNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFEBDNOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

1.58

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

2.33

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.38

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

12.43

-3.38

GFEB vs. DNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the DNOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFEB and DNOV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFEBDNOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.58

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

0.81

+0.74

Correlation

The correlation between GFEB and DNOV is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GFEB vs. DNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFEB nor DNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GFEB vs. DNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum DNOV drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEB and DNOV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFEBDNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-15.03%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.27%

-6.13%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-2.78%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-2.06%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.17%

+0.16%

Volatility

GFEB vs. DNOV - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) at 2.68%. This indicates that GFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFEBDNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.68%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.30%

4.45%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

9.09%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.68%

7.59%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.68%

9.12%

-1.44%