GFEB vs. FDND
GFEB (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the NONE, while FDND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by FT Vest. GFEB is passively managed, while FDND is actively managed. Over the past year, GFEB returned 12.99% vs 1.61% for FDND. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FDND.
Performance
GFEB vs. FDND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFEB achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's 0.56% return.
GFEB
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 12.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.87%
FDND
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $52.86K | $42.66K | $64.39K | |
| $413.17K | $556.79K | $426.93K |
GFEB vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 6.68% | 11.19% | 8.80% |
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 0.56% | 9.69% | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFEB and FDND is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between GFEB and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFEB vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank
GFEB
FDND
GFEB vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFEB | FDND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.00 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | -0.08 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.58 | -0.18 | +14.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFEB vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEB and FDND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFEB | FDND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -24.12% | +14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.46% | -20.49% | +16.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.97% | +5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -5.84% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 9.05% | -8.20% |
Volatility
GFEB vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) is 1.46%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that GFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFEB | FDND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 5.55% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.59% | 15.62% | -11.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.65% | 19.58% | -13.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 21.40% | -13.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 21.40% | -13.90% |
GFEB vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFEB vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison
GFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 8.09% | 8.11% | 5.51% |
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFEB and FDND have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDND has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to GFEB (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFEB dropped -9.63% vs FDND's -24.12%.
On 1-year performance, GFEB leads with 12.99% vs 1.61% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GFEB has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GFEB.
FDND has the higher dividend yield at 8.09%, compared with 0.00% for GFEB.
GFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GFEB and 0.75% for FDND.
GFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFEB and FDND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer