GFEB vs. AMZY
GFEB (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the NONE, while AMZY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. GFEB is passively managed, while AMZY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GFEB returned 12.42%/yr vs 22.79%/yr for AMZY. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for AMZY.
Performance
GFEB vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFEB achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than AMZY's 14.08% return.
GFEB
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 5.89%
- YTD
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.96%
AMZY
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.63M | $2.96M | $4.73M | |
| $442.36K | $554.58K | $432.73K |
GFEB vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 7.10% | 11.19% | 13.06% | 4.94% |
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 14.08% | 10.39% | 35.28% | 18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFEB and AMZY is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between GFEB and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFEB vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank
GFEB
AMZY
GFEB vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFEB | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.17 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 1.09 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.91 | 2.40 | +13.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFEB vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEB and AMZY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFEB | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -23.70% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.46% | -19.61% | +15.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.63% | -23.70% | +14.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -5.57% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 8.87% | -8.02% |
Volatility
GFEB vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) is 1.51%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 13.72%. This indicates that GFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFEB | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 13.72% | -12.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | 21.48% | -16.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 27.32% | -21.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 26.13% | -18.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 26.13% | -18.63% |
GFEB vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFEB vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison
GFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 45.29% | 52.59% | 47.91% | 9.90% |
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFEB and AMZY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZY has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to GFEB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFEB dropped -9.63% vs AMZY's -23.70%.
On 3-year performance, AMZY leads with 22.79% vs 12.42% for GFEB. On fees, GFEB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 22.79% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GFEB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.
AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 45.29%, compared with 0.00% for GFEB.
GFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while AMZY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GFEB and 1.09% for AMZY.
GFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFEB and AMZY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer