PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFAFX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFAFX achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return. Over the past 10 years, GFAFX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 15.95%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.


GFAFX

1D
0.38%
1M
7.35%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
15.95%

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1
10.42%19.66%27.96%37.15%-30.78%19.24%37.78%28.10%-3.23%26.07%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GFAFX and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.91

The correlation between GFAFX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFAFX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFAFX
GFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFAFXQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.73

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.55

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.71

-1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

14.30

-6.36

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFAFX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFAFXQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.73

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.99

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.41

+0.15

Drawdowns

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFAFX drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFAFX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFAFXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-82.97%

+31.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-11.96%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.57%

-22.77%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.41%

-35.12%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.41%

-35.12%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-32.79%

+24.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.11%

+0.42%

Volatility

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) is 3.62%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that GFAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFAFXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

4.48%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

12.11%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

15.95%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.25%

22.39%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

22.30%

-2.61%

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFAFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFAFX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

GFAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1
9.73%10.75%9.01%7.41%4.02%8.16%4.28%7.14%11.96%6.98%6.60%8.86%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GFAFX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to GFAFX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFAFX dropped -51.87% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFAFX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer