GFAFX vs. FSKAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GFAFX (American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both mutual funds - GFAFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Funds, while FSKAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, GFAFX returned 14.97%/yr vs 14.44%/yr for FSKAX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. GFAFX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.

Performance

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFAFX achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 9.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GFAFX having a 14.97% annualized return and FSKAX not far behind at 14.44%.

GFAFX

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -3.25%
• 6M: 3.73%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 14.97%
• ALL TIME*: 10.39%

FSKAX

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -0.80%
• 6M: 8.19%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 11.63%
• 10Y*: 14.44%
• ALL TIME*: 14.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GFAFX American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFAFX American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1	4.36%	19.66%	27.96%	37.15%	-30.78%	19.24%	37.78%	28.10%	-3.23%	26.07%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	9.87%	17.06%	23.89%	26.12%	-19.53%	25.66%	20.79%	30.92%	-5.32%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GFAFX and FSKAX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011	0.95

The correlation between GFAFX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GFAFX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFAFX

GFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 17
GFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
GFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
GFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
GFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FSKAX

FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFAFX	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	1.41	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	1.98	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.25	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	2.09	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.87	8.96	-6.09

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFAFX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFAFX drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFAFX and FSKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFAFX	FSKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.87%	-35.01%	-16.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-8.92%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.57%	-19.43%	-2.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.41%	-25.39%	-11.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.41%	-35.01%	-1.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.49%	-1.97%	-3.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.58%	-3.99%	-4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	2.08%	+1.72%

Volatility

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 3.43%. This indicates that GFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFAFX	FSKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	3.43%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.65%	10.33%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.91%	13.21%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.52%	17.52%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	18.45%	+1.31%

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFAFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFAFX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

GFAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.30%, more than FSKAX's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	0.95%	1.01%	1.19%	1.41%	1.62%	1.15%	1.45%	1.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.43%	0.82%
GFAFX American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1	10.30%	10.75%	9.01%	7.41%	4.02%	8.16%	4.28%	7.14%	11.96%	6.98%	6.60%	8.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFAFX and FSKAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, GFAFX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GFAFX or FSKAX?

GFAFX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FSKAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFAFX dropped -51.87% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.