GEW vs. BLDG
GEW (Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GEW is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GEW charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
GEW vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEW achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's 13.98% return.
GEW
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $91.83K | $83.90K | $581.35K | |
| $7.37K | $7.45K | $148.22K |
GEW vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 9.33% | 3.68% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 13.98% | -2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEW and BLDG is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEW vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
GEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLDG
GEW vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF (GEW) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEW | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEW vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEW drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEW and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEW | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -27.25% | +19.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.92% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -8.99% | +7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility
GEW vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEW | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.03% | 11.52% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 15.23% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 15.50% | -1.47% |
GEW vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEW vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
GEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than BLDG's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.15% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEW and BLDG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 1.24% for GEW.
GEW is categorized as Global Equities, while BLDG is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GEW and 0.59% for BLDG.
Find the right allocation for GEW and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer