GEVG vs. MSTZ
GEVG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GEVG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. GEVG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
GEVG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEVG achieves a 106.82% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.
GEVG
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 117.21%
- YTD
- 106.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 38.88%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 1Y
- 299.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEVG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEVG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF | 106.82% | -11.27% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -27.52% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEVG and MSTZ is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEVG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
GEVG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTZ
GEVG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEVG | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEVG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEVG drawdown since its inception was -45.50%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEVG and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEVG | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.50% | -99.38% | +53.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.95% | -97.53% | +71.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -94.55% | +82.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.95% | — |
Volatility
GEVG vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEVG | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 134.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.65% | 148.58% | -45.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.65% | 170.73% | -68.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.65% | 170.73% | -68.08% |
GEVG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEVG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEVG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GEVG nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GEVG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
GEVG and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GEVG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GEVG and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for GEVG and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer