PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEVG vs. MSFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEVG vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEVG achieves a 88.18% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -27.69% return.


GEVG

1D
-2.09%
1M
-22.22%
YTD
88.18%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFL

1D
-6.43%
1M
5.25%
YTD
-27.69%
6M
-26.50%
1Y
-25.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEVG vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GEVG and MSFL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEVG vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEVG

MSFL
MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEVG vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GEVG vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEVGMSFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

-0.23

+2.40

Drawdowns

GEVG vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEVG drawdown since its inception was -33.81%, smaller than the maximum MSFL drawdown of -59.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEVG and MSFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEVGMSFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-59.39%

+25.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.62%

-43.65%

+11.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-21.58%

+12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.61%

Volatility

GEVG vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEVGMSFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.61%

50.19%

+46.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.61%

49.60%

+47.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.61%

49.60%

+47.01%

GEVG vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEVG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEVG vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEVG nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GEVG and MSFL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for MSFL.

GEVG and MSFL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GEVG and 1.15% for MSFL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEVG and MSFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer