PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GETGX vs. RSNRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund (GETGX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GETGX achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly lower than RSNRX's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GETGX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.


GETGX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.18%
6M
7.97%
YTD
14.11%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
10.56%
ALL TIME*
10.61%

RSNRX

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.77%
6M
12.57%
YTD
27.93%
1Y
73.43%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
29.33%
10Y*
12.49%
ALL TIME*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GETGX
Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund
14.11%2.11%9.53%9.86%-3.05%31.20%7.56%28.10%-10.50%15.45%
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
27.93%69.60%15.94%-8.64%35.02%83.01%27.35%-24.49%-45.81%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GETGX and RSNRX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between GETGX and RSNRX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GETGX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GETGX
GETGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GETGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GETGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GETGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GETGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GETGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RSNRX
RSNRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
RSNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RSNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund (GETGX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GETGXRSNRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.52

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

6.30

-4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

17.38

-10.68

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GETGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the RSNRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GETGX and RSNRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GETGX drawdown since its inception was -49.09%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GETGX and RSNRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GETGXRSNRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.09%

-89.73%

+40.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-11.65%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

-25.09%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

-25.44%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.06%

-84.27%

+43.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-7.80%

+6.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-25.82%

+20.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

4.21%

-1.85%

Volatility

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund (GETGX) is 2.65%, while Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that GETGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GETGXRSNRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

4.87%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

16.98%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

23.33%

-11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

24.57%

-7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

31.33%

-12.17%

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GETGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GETGX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison

GETGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than RSNRX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GETGX
Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund
4.16%4.39%11.30%5.79%7.89%8.04%5.12%5.70%10.23%2.89%1.20%11.26%
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
3.42%4.38%1.65%2.36%0.78%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GETGX and RSNRX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSNRX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GETGX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GETGX dropped -49.09% vs RSNRX's -89.73%.

RSNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GETGX and RSNRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer