GERM vs. PSIL
GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GERM is passively managed, while PSIL is actively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs 76.10% for PSIL. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for PSIL.
Performance
GERM vs. PSIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSIL
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 25.04%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 76.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM vs. PSIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 25.04% | 74.55% | 37.87% |
GERM vs. PSIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GERM
PSIL
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GERM
PSIL
Financial Services
GERM
PSIL
-
Basic Materials
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Communication Services
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Consumer Defensive
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Energy
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Industrials
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Real Estate
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Technology
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Utilities
GERM
-
PSIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERM vs. PSIL — Risk / Return Rank
GERM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSIL
GERM vs. PSIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GERM | PSIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GERM vs. PSIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PSIL drawdown of -92.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and PSIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERM | PSIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -92.72% | +92.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -20.38% | +20.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -75.68% | +75.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -76.71% | +76.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 9.75% | -9.75% |
Volatility
GERM vs. PSIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERM | PSIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 12.82% | -12.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 28.52% | -28.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 42.43% | -42.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 62.98% | -62.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 62.98% | -62.98% |
GERM vs. PSIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than PSIL's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GERM vs. PSIL - Dividend Comparison
GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 7.94% | 10.95% | 1.49% | 0.24% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSIL has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs PSIL's -92.72%.
On 1-year performance, PSIL leads with 76.10% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSIL has performed better with a 76.10% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.
PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 7.94%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 1.00% for PSIL.
Find the right allocation for GERM and PSIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer