GERM vs. EDOC
GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - GERM tracks the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index while EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs -16.13% for EDOC. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
GERM vs. EDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDOC
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -16.13%
- 3Y*
- -8.12%
- 5Y*
- -14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
GERM vs. EDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -10.37% | -0.62% | 5.70% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERM vs. EDOC — Risk / Return Rank
GERM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDOC
GERM vs. EDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GERM | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GERM vs. EDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum EDOC drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and EDOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERM | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -65.76% | +65.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -30.71% | +30.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -61.31% | +61.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -43.20% | +43.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 15.98% | -15.98% |
Volatility
GERM vs. EDOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERM | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 7.26% | -7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 16.63% | -16.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 22.43% | -22.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 26.46% | -26.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 26.28% | -26.28% |
GERM vs. EDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GERM and EDOC have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
GERM vs. EDOC - Dividend Comparison
GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs EDOC's -65.76%.
On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -16.13% for EDOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -16.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM and EDOC have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
EDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X.
Find the right allocation for GERM and EDOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer