PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOC vs. EBIZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -14.58% return, which is significantly lower than EBIZ's -13.52% return.


EDOC

1D
-2.31%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
-14.58%
6M
-19.25%
1Y
-20.75%
3Y*
-10.11%
5Y*
-14.38%
10Y*

EBIZ

1D
-0.60%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
-13.52%
6M
-13.97%
1Y
-6.24%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
-3.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EDOC
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF
-14.58%-0.62%-2.87%-12.61%-29.99%-14.21%23.87%
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
-13.52%17.74%31.26%30.88%-40.96%-13.26%22.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOC and EBIZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020

0.74

The correlation between EDOC and EBIZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOC vs. EBIZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOC
EDOC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EBIZ
EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOCEBIZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.95

-0.32

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.30

-0.31

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.96

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

-0.19

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.34

-0.39

-0.96

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOC Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the EBIZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOC and EBIZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOCEBIZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

-0.32

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

-0.11

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.30

-0.69

Drawdowns

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than EBIZ's maximum drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and EBIZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOCEBIZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.76%

-61.58%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.71%

-27.73%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.78%

-27.73%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.36%

-58.21%

-2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.12%

-24.21%

-38.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.01%

-24.33%

-18.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.04%

13.33%

+1.71%

Volatility

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) have volatilities of 5.09% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOCEBIZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.00%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.71%

14.88%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.87%

19.75%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.36%

28.90%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.19%

28.68%

-2.49%

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOC vs. EBIZ - Dividend Comparison

EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than EBIZ's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
0.59%0.51%0.23%0.00%0.10%0.57%0.84%0.18%
EDOC
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF
0.39%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOC and EBIZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDOC has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to EBIZ (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs EBIZ's -61.58%.

On 5-year performance, EBIZ leads with -3.19% vs -14.38% for EDOC. On fees, EBIZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EBIZ has performed better with a -3.19% return vs -14.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBIZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.

EBIZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.39% for EDOC.

EDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EBIZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.50% for EBIZ.

EBIZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOC and EBIZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer