GERM vs. BITY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GERM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. GERM is passively managed, while BITY is actively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs -37.35% for BITY. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.

Performance

GERM vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GERM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITY

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -19.63%
• YTD: -23.09%
• 6M: -26.69%
• 1Y: -37.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GERM vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-23.09%	-8.21%

Return for Risk

GERM vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GERM vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GERM	BITY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.70	—

Drawdowns

GERM vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BITY drawdown of -46.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and BITY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GERM	BITY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-46.36%	+46.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-46.36%	+46.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-45.49%	+45.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-19.67%	+19.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	26.48%	-26.48%

Volatility

GERM vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GERM	BITY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	9.68%	-9.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	31.24%	-31.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	39.94%	-39.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	39.02%	-39.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	39.02%	-39.02%

GERM vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GERM vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.66%.

Position	TTM	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	39.66%	21.53%
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, GERM or BITY?

BITY has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs BITY's -46.36%.

Which ETF is better, GERM or BITY?

On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GERM or BITY?

Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GERM or BITY?

BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GERM or BITY?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.

What is the main difference between GERM and BITY?

GERM is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BITY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.65% for BITY.