PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEQZX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEQZX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GEQZX has outperformed GTLOX with an annualized return of 14.93%, while GTLOX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.70% annualized return.


GEQZX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.65%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.30%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
14.93%

GTLOX

1D
1.39%
1M
9.29%
YTD
22.45%
6M
24.47%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEQZX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class
11.31%16.77%24.53%26.17%-19.99%27.94%17.85%31.34%-4.74%21.66%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.45%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%-7.97%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GEQZX and GTLOX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.94

The correlation between GEQZX and GTLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEQZX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEQZX
GEQZX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GEQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEQZXGTLOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

3.17

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

4.30

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.55

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

5.88

-2.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.96

25.30

-10.34

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEQZX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEQZXGTLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

3.17

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.52

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.61

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.50

-0.02

Drawdowns

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEQZX drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, roughly equal to the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEQZX and GTLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEQZXGTLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-54.09%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-7.47%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-32.85%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.01%

-32.85%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-38.15%

+4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-8.33%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.73%

+0.18%

Volatility

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) is 2.85%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that GEQZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEQZXGTLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

4.25%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

10.36%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

13.88%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.86%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

20.91%

-2.80%

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEQZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEQZX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

GEQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than GTLOX's 14.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEQZX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class
1.21%1.35%3.58%3.71%1.12%3.05%2.13%2.02%1.79%1.94%1.42%1.67%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.62%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEQZX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to GEQZX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEQZX dropped -55.67% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEQZX and GTLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer