PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEOA vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEOA vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund (GEOA) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEOA achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 16.66% return.


GEOA

1D
0.25%
1M
0.36%
6M
2.75%
YTD
9.60%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.38%

DHS

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.58%
6M
9.76%
YTD
16.66%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.32M$3.61M$2.98M
$138.74K$67.68K$27.48K

GEOA vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GEOA and DHS is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEOA vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GEOA
GEOA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GEOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GEOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEOA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GEOA vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund (GEOA) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEOADHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

3.97

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

14.58

-7.65

GEOA vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEOA Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEOA and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEOA vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEOA drawdown since its inception was -11.74%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOA and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEOADHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-67.25%

+55.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-6.30%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-2.23%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-9.48%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.71%

+1.85%

Volatility

GEOA vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund (GEOA) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEOADHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.88%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

7.92%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

10.43%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

13.91%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

16.09%

-2.33%

GEOA vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEOA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEOA vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

GEOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than DHS's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.19%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
GEOA
WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund
0.55%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEOA and DHS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHS has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to GEOA (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEOA dropped -11.74% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 1-year performance, GEOA leads with 25.66% vs 25.21% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GEOA has performed better with a 25.66% return vs 25.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GEOA.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.55% for GEOA.

GEOA is categorized as Global Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. GEOA tracks WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GEOA and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEOA and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer