GEOA vs. USFR
GEOA (WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GEOA is a Macro Trading fund tracking the WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. GEOA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
GEOA vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEOA achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return.
GEOA
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
GEOA vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEOA WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 9.32% | 11.11% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.78% | 1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEOA and USFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEOA vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
GEOA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USFR
GEOA vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund (GEOA) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEOA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 13.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 200.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 775.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEOA vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEOA drawdown since its inception was -11.74%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOA and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEOA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -1.36% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | 0.00% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -0.15% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
GEOA vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEOA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 0.27% | +13.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 0.40% | +13.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 0.78% | +13.15% |
GEOA vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEOA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEOA vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
GEOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEOA WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEOA and USFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GEOA.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.55% for GEOA.
GEOA is categorized as Macro Trading, while USFR is Government Bonds. GEOA tracks WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GEOA and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for GEOA and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer