GEOA vs. GDMN
GEOA (WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GEOA is a Macro Trading fund tracking the WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. GEOA is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GEOA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
GEOA vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEOA achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -13.26% return.
GEOA
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDMN
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- -13.26%
- 6M
- -19.52%
- 1Y
- 61.98%
- 3Y*
- 59.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEOA vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEOA WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 9.32% | 11.11% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -13.26% | 83.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEOA and GDMN is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEOA vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
GEOA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDMN
GEOA vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund (GEOA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEOA | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEOA vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEOA drawdown since its inception was -11.74%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOA and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEOA | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -52.82% | +41.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -43.06% | +40.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -19.11% | +16.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.77% | — |
Volatility
GEOA vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEOA | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 63.98% | -50.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 48.18% | -34.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 48.18% | -34.25% |
GEOA vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEOA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEOA vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
GEOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than GDMN's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.11% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
GEOA WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEOA and GDMN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GEOA.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.55% for GEOA.
GEOA is categorized as Macro Trading, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GEOA and 0.45% for GDMN.
Find the right allocation for GEOA and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer