GENZ vs. TDV
GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GENZ tracks the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index while TDV tracks the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GENZ returned -3.36%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for TDV. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for TDV.
Performance
GENZ vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -8.92% return, which is significantly lower than TDV's 14.99% return.
GENZ
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 1Y
- -13.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.53%
- 5Y*
- -3.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.85%
TDV
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $64.71K | $66.66K | $80.30K | |
| $551.98K | $539.76K | $593.04K |
GENZ vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | -8.92% | 4.15% | -1.39% | 11.52% | -12.83% | -4.30% | 12.72% | 7.93% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 14.99% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENZ and TDV is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GENZ and TDV has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GENZ vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GENZ
TDV
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
GENZ
TDV
-
Financial Services
GENZ
TDV
Technology
GENZ
TDV
Consumer Cyclical
GENZ
TDV
-
Industrials
GENZ
TDV
Basic Materials
GENZ
-
TDV
-
Consumer Defensive
GENZ
-
TDV
-
Energy
GENZ
-
TDV
-
Healthcare
GENZ
-
TDV
-
Real Estate
GENZ
-
TDV
-
Utilities
GENZ
-
TDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENZ vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
GENZ
TDV
GENZ vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENZ | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.19 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.19 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 5.76 | -6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENZ vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENZ | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -32.78% | -38.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -9.55% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | -22.51% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.93% | -25.11% | -14.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.49% | -6.97% | -21.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.57% | -5.37% | -19.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.08% | 3.63% | +12.45% |
Volatility
GENZ vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.85%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENZ | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 5.85% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.84% | 15.38% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 19.42% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 20.83% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 23.27% | +1.88% |
GENZ vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENZ vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than TDV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | 3.66% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.06% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENZ and TDV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENZ has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to TDV (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs TDV's -32.78%.
On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 11.48% vs -3.36% for GENZ. On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 11.48% return vs -3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.
GENZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.06% for TDV.
GENZ tracks MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while TDV tracks S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.45% for TDV.
TDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENZ and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer