PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GENZ vs. TIME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GENZ vs. TIME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. GENZ is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, GENZ returned -7.41% vs 23.44% for TIME. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.

Performance

GENZ vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -15.11% return, which is significantly lower than TIME's 9.82% return.

GENZ

1D
-2.34%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-15.11%
6M
-15.40%
1Y
-7.41%
3Y*
-5.47%
5Y*
-7.13%
10Y*
2.44%

TIME

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.38%
YTD
9.82%
6M
10.85%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENZ vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
GENZ
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF		-15.11%4.15%2.76%
TIME
Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF		9.82%10.17%6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GENZ and TIME is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024

0.41

The correlation between GENZ and TIME shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GENZ vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GENZ
TIME

Financial Services

29.3%
3.2%

Communication Services

29.1%
17.4%

Technology

20.6%
38.5%

Consumer Cyclical

20.2%
13.8%

Industrials

0.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Energy

-

8.4%

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

5.1%

Financial Services

GENZ
29.3%
TIME
3.2%

Communication Services

GENZ
29.1%
TIME
17.4%

Technology

GENZ
20.6%
TIME
38.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GENZ
20.2%
TIME
13.8%

Industrials

GENZ
0.9%
TIME
1.0%

Basic Materials

GENZ

-

TIME
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

GENZ

-

TIME
10.1%

Energy

GENZ

-

TIME
8.4%

Healthcare

GENZ

-

TIME
0.5%

Real Estate

GENZ

-

TIME

-

Utilities

GENZ

-

TIME
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF

Often compared with GENZ:
GENZ vs. XLKGENZ vs. NLRGENZ vs. DAPPGENZ vs. FLTRGENZ vs. VGTGENZ vs. ARMHGENZ vs. BCI
Often compared with TIME:
TIME vs. SMHTIME vs. DATTIME vs. MSTYTIME vs. TMFETIME vs. HAILTIME vs. HYGWTIME vs. QYLD

Return for Risk

GENZ vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GENZ
GENZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
GENZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GENZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENZ vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GENZTIMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.39
1.78

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.44
2.40

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.31

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

1.80

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

6.63

-7.15

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GENZ vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENZ and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GENZTIMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

1.78

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.80

-0.75

Drawdowns

GENZ vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and TIME.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GENZTIMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-24.26%

-46.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-13.09%

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.89%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.43%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.35%

-0.74%

-32.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-5.60%

-18.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.22%

3.55%

+10.67%

Volatility

GENZ vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 3.48%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GENZTIMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

3.48%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

10.14%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

13.27%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

17.62%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.11%

17.62%

+7.49%

GENZ vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENZ vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than TIME's 9.12% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GENZ
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF		3.93%3.34%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%
TIME
Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF		9.12%10.02%15.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GENZ and TIME have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GENZ has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to TIME (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs TIME's -24.26%.

On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 23.44% vs -7.41% for GENZ. On fees, GENZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 23.44% return vs -7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GENZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.12%, compared with 3.93% for GENZ.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 1.00% for TIME.

TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENZ and TIME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer