PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GENZ vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GENZ vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -15.11% return, which is significantly lower than BIZD's -8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GENZ has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 2.44%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.77% annualized return.


GENZ

1D
-2.34%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-15.11%
6M
-15.40%
1Y
-7.41%
3Y*
-5.47%
5Y*
-7.13%
10Y*
2.44%

BIZD

1D
-2.28%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
-8.99%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENZ vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GENZ
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF
-15.11%4.15%-1.39%11.52%-12.83%-4.30%12.72%30.17%-26.79%41.11%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-8.99%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GENZ and BIZD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.49

The correlation between GENZ and BIZD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

GENZ vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GENZ
BIZD

Financial Services

29.3%
100.0%

Communication Services

29.1%

-

Technology

20.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

20.2%

-

Industrials

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

GENZ
29.3%
BIZD
100.0%

Communication Services

GENZ
29.1%
BIZD

-

Technology

GENZ
20.6%
BIZD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GENZ
20.2%
BIZD

-

Industrials

GENZ
0.9%
BIZD

-

Basic Materials

GENZ

-

BIZD

-

Consumer Defensive

GENZ

-

BIZD

-

Energy

GENZ

-

BIZD

-

Healthcare

GENZ

-

BIZD

-

Real Estate

GENZ

-

BIZD

-

Utilities

GENZ

-

BIZD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GENZ vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENZ
GENZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
GENZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GENZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENZ vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GENZBIZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.90

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

-0.58

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

-1.03

+0.50

GENZ vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENZ and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GENZBIZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

-0.72

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.23

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.36

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.30

-0.25

Drawdowns

GENZ vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENZBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-55.44%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-22.22%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

-22.56%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.89%

-22.91%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.43%

-55.44%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.35%

-19.27%

-14.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-6.72%

-17.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.22%

12.63%

+1.59%

Volatility

GENZ vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.79%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENZBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

4.79%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

14.77%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

18.11%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

17.40%

+7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.11%

21.74%

+3.37%

GENZ vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

GENZ vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than BIZD's 13.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.87%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
GENZ
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF
3.93%3.34%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GENZ and BIZD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GENZ has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to BIZD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.77% vs 2.44% for GENZ. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 3.93% for GENZ.

GENZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. GENZ tracks MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.42% for BIZD.

GENZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENZ and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer