PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GENT vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GENT vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENT achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 4.22% return.


GENT

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.54%
6M
-0.18%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.56%

UUP

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.60%
6M
4.92%
YTD
4.22%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
3.22%
ALL TIME*
1.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$387.58K$269.93K$333.29K
$55.14M$58.68M$59.16M

GENT vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GENT and UUP is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GENT vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GENT
GENT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GENT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GENT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GENT vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GENTUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.22

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

3.83

-0.27

GENT vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENT Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENT and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GENT vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENT drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENT and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENTUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-22.19%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.96%

-3.65%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-2.41%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-8.86%

+8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.33%

-0.52%

Volatility

GENT vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) is 0.77%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that GENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENTUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.65%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

4.11%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

5.88%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

7.23%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

6.89%

-3.16%

GENT vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GENT vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

GENT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than UUP's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GENT
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF
4.24%4.26%2.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.29%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GENT and UUP have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUP has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to GENT (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENT dropped -2.50% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 1-year performance, UUP leads with 5.67% vs 2.17% for GENT. On fees, GENT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, GENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UUP has performed better with a 5.67% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GENT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

GENT has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 3.29% for UUP.

GENT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENT and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENT and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer