EDGF vs. EDGH

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGF is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management, while EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EDGF returned 3.71% vs 27.53% for EDGH. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDGF charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EDGH.

Performance

EDGF vs. EDGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGF achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than EDGH's 9.57% return.

EDGF

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 3.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EDGH

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 27.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGF vs. EDGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	0.99%	4.36%	-1.41%
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	9.57%	28.98%	-1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGF and EDGH is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.10

EDGF vs. EDGH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDGF	EDGH
Financial Services	99.2%	92.7%
Basic Materials	-	7.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EDGF vs. EDGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGF

EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 72
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 67
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

EDGH

EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 49
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 53
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGF vs. EDGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDGF	EDGH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.52	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	1.88	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.48	2.56	+2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	8.26	+5.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDGF vs. EDGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the EDGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGF and EDGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDGF	EDGH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.52	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.39	-0.39

Drawdowns

EDGF vs. EDGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGF drawdown since its inception was -1.62%, smaller than the maximum EDGH drawdown of -10.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGF and EDGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGF	EDGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-10.60%	+8.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.64%	-10.60%	+9.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.27%	+7.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-2.06%	+1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	3.28%	-3.03%

Volatility

EDGF vs. EDGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) is 0.27%, while 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that EDGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDGF	EDGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	3.67%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.25%	14.92%	-13.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93%	17.88%	-15.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.35%	15.68%	-13.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.35%	15.68%	-13.33%

EDGF vs. EDGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGH's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGF vs. EDGH - Dividend Comparison

EDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than EDGH's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	3.45%	3.61%	0.49%
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	1.07%	1.18%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGF and EDGH in my portfolio?

EDGF and EDGH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDGF or EDGH?

EDGH has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to EDGF (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGF dropped -1.62% vs EDGH's -10.60%.

Which ETF is better, EDGF or EDGH?

On 1-year performance, EDGH leads with 27.53% vs 3.71% for EDGF. On fees, EDGF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, EDGF has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDGF or EDGH?

Over the 1-year period, EDGH has performed better with a 27.53% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGF or EDGH?

EDGF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGF or EDGH?

EDGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.07% for EDGH.

What is the main difference between EDGF and EDGH?

EDGF is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while EDGH is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for EDGF and 1.01% for EDGH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.