GENM vs. ISCMF
GENM (Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. GENM is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, GENM returned 5.22% vs 37.85% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GENM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
GENM vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENM achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
GENM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENM vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF | 1.68% | 5.10% | 2.29% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | -6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENM and ISCMF is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024 | -0.03 |
The correlation between GENM and ISCMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENM vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
GENM
ISCMF
GENM vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENM | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 2.53 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 6.69 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | 15.68 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENM | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.05 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.45 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
GENM vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENM drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENM and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENM | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -25.42% | +23.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.15% | -5.69% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -5.26% | +4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -13.43% | +12.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 2.42% | -1.76% |
Volatility
GENM vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) is 0.61%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that GENM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENM | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 7.14% | -6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 15.90% | -14.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 18.53% | -15.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 14.38% | -11.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 14.38% | -11.22% |
GENM vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENM vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
GENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.19% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENM and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to GENM (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENM dropped -2.41% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 37.85% vs 5.22% for GENM. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, GENM has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GENM.
GENM has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
GENM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GENM and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENM and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer