GENM vs. GEND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GENM (Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF) and GEND (Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while GEND is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Genter Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GENM returned 5.22% vs 25.44% for GEND. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GENM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GEND.

Performance

GENM vs. GEND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENM achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than GEND's 11.95% return.

GENM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GEND

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 6M: 12.26%
• 1Y: 25.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENM vs. GEND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF	1.68%	5.52%
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	11.95%	16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GENM and GEND is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

GENM vs. GEND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENM

GENM Risk / Return Rank: 55
GENM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
GENM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
GENM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GENM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
GENM Martin Ratio Rank: 48

GEND

GEND Risk / Return Rank: 76
GEND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GEND Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GEND Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GEND Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GEND Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENM vs. GEND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GENM	GEND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.41	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.49	-0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.42	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	4.00	-1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.90	14.48	-6.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GENM vs. GEND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GEND Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENM and GEND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GENM	GEND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.41	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	1.51	-0.08

Drawdowns

GENM vs. GEND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENM drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, smaller than the maximum GEND drawdown of -13.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENM and GEND.

Drawdown Indicators

	GENM	GEND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-13.31%	+10.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.15%	-6.40%	+4.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-1.46%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-1.88%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	1.76%	-1.10%

Volatility

GENM vs. GEND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) is 0.61%, while Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that GENM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GENM	GEND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	2.56%	-1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.86%	8.01%	-6.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88%	10.62%	-7.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.16%	14.15%	-10.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.16%	14.15%	-10.99%

GENM vs. GEND - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GEND's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENM vs. GEND - Dividend Comparison

GENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than GEND's 2.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	2.74%	2.10%	0.00%
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF	2.92%	2.88%	2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GENM and GEND in my portfolio?

GENM and GEND have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GENM or GEND?

GEND has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to GENM (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENM dropped -2.41% vs GEND's -13.31%.

Which ETF is better, GENM or GEND?

On 1-year performance, GEND leads with 25.44% vs 5.22% for GENM. On fees, GEND is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, GENM has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GENM or GEND?

Over the 1-year period, GEND has performed better with a 25.44% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GENM or GEND?

GEND is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GENM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GENM or GEND?

GENM has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.74% for GEND.

What is the main difference between GENM and GEND?

GENM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GEND is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GENM and 0.38% for GEND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GEND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.