GENL.L vs. MED
GENL.L (Genel Energy plc) and MED (Medifast, Inc.) are both stocks. GENL.L operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while MED operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GENL.L returned -5.57%/yr vs -6.81%/yr for MED. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GENL.L vs. MED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GENL.L is traded in GBp, while MED is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MED values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENL.L achieves a -9.58% return, which is significantly lower than MED's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GENL.L has outperformed MED with an annualized return of -5.57%, while MED has yielded a comparatively lower -6.81% annualized return.
GENL.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- -9.58%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -0.00%
- 3Y*
- -22.28%
- 5Y*
- -16.59%
- 10Y*
- -5.57%
MED
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- -7.26%
- 3Y*
- -47.81%
- 5Y*
- -45.33%
- 10Y*
- -6.81%
GENL.L vs. MED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENL.L Genel Energy plc | -9.58% | -9.85% | -13.95% | -34.46% | 2.60% | -4.92% | -17.71% | 11.73% | 64.64% | 31.40% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 11.90% | -43.71% | -73.33% | -41.42% | -35.45% | 10.40% | 80.71% | -13.17% | 92.91% | 57.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENL.L and MED is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011 | 0.05 |
The correlation between GENL.L and MED shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GENL.L:
£148.51M
MED:
$130.86M
GENL.L:
-$0.31
MED:
-$1.82
GENL.L:
1.38
MED:
0.38
GENL.L:
0.57
MED:
0.66
GENL.L:
$143.56M
MED:
$346.10M
GENL.L:
$1.98M
MED:
$242.70M
GENL.L:
$21.56M
MED:
-$3.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENL.L vs. MED — Risk / Return Rank
GENL.L
MED
GENL.L vs. MED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genel Energy plc (GENL.L) and Medifast, Inc. (MED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENL.L | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.00 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | -0.23 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.12 | -0.39 | +0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENL.L vs. MED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENL.L drawdown since its inception was -94.88%, roughly equal to the maximum MED drawdown of -96.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENL.L and MED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENL.L | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.88% | -96.56% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.50% | -36.26% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.75% | -91.26% | +36.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.73% | -96.16% | +24.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.41% | -96.56% | +16.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.45% | -95.72% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -39.64% | -29.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.45% | 21.00% | +0.45% |
Volatility
GENL.L vs. MED - Volatility Comparison
Genel Energy plc (GENL.L) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Medifast, Inc. (MED) at 9.02%. This indicates that GENL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENL.L | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.54% | 9.02% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.85% | 31.91% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.79% | 41.58% | +9.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.15% | 44.42% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.15% | 47.43% | +7.72% |
Dividends
GENL.L vs. MED - Dividend Comparison
Neither GENL.L nor MED has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENL.L Genel Energy plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.12% | 9.35% | 6.42% | 6.55% | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% |
Financials
GENL.L vs. MED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genel Energy plc and Medifast, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GENL.L vs. MED - Profitability Comparison
GENL.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genel Energy plc reported a gross profit of -3.72M and revenue of 33.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -11.3%.
MED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.76M and revenue of 76.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
GENL.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genel Energy plc reported an operating income of -12.36M and revenue of 33.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.4%.
MED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.30M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.
GENL.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genel Energy plc reported a net income of -9.55M and revenue of 33.06M, resulting in a net margin of -28.9%.
MED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a net income of -2.12M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GENL.L and MED have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GENL.L and MED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer