GEND vs. GENT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GEND (Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF) and GENT (Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GEND is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while GENT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Genter Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GEND returned 25.74% vs 2.17% for GENT. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.

Performance

GEND vs. GENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEND achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than GENT's -0.01% return.

GEND

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 16.28%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.95%

GENT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: -0.18%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	$4.13K	$11.85K	$22.56K
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	$387.58K	$269.93K	$333.29K

GEND vs. GENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	16.28%	16.84%
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	-0.01%	7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GEND and GENT is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

GEND vs. GENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GEND

GEND Risk / Return Rank: 90
GEND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GEND Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GEND Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GEND Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GEND Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GENT

GENT Risk / Return Rank: 33
GENT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
GENT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GENT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GENT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GENT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GEND vs. GENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GEND	GENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	0.73	+1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	1.08	+2.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.13	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	1.47	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.29	3.56	+10.73

GEND vs. GENT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEND Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the GENT Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEND and GENT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GEND vs. GENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, which is greater than GENT's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEND and GENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEND	GENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.31%	-2.50%	-10.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.40%	-1.96%	-4.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-1.30%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-0.71%	-1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	0.81%	+0.95%

Volatility

GEND vs. GENT - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) at 0.77%. This indicates that GEND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEND	GENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	0.77%	+2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.96%	2.97%	+4.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	3.93%	+6.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.81%	3.73%	+10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.81%	3.73%	+10.08%

GEND vs. GENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GEND and GENT have an expense ratio of 0.38%.

Dividends

GEND vs. GENT - Dividend Comparison

GEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than GENT's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	2.66%	2.10%	0.00%
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	4.24%	4.26%	2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEND and GENT in my portfolio?

GEND and GENT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GEND or GENT?

GEND has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to GENT (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEND dropped -13.31% vs GENT's -2.50%.

Which ETF is better, GEND or GENT?

On 1-year performance, GEND leads with 25.74% vs 2.17% for GENT. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, GENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GEND or GENT?

Over the 1-year period, GEND has performed better with a 25.74% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GEND or GENT?

GEND and GENT have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GEND or GENT?

GENT has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 2.66% for GEND.

What is the main difference between GEND and GENT?

GEND is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GENT is Intermediate Core Bond.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GEND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.