PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEMD vs. VWOB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEMD vs. VWOB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEMD achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than VWOB's 1.92% return.


GEMD

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.79%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.29%
1Y
10.81%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
10Y*

VWOB

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.64%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.94%
1Y
10.08%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
3.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEMD vs. VWOB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GEMD
Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
2.26%13.67%3.31%8.51%-15.70%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
1.92%13.49%5.20%10.68%-13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GEMD and VWOB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022

0.95

The correlation between GEMD and VWOB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEMD vs. VWOB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEMD
GEMD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VWOB
VWOB Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VWOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWOB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VWOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWOB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEMD vs. VWOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEMDVWOBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.26

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

9.52

+0.31

GEMD vs. VWOB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VWOB Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEMD and VWOB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEMD vs. VWOB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEMD drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, smaller than the maximum VWOB drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMD and VWOB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMDVWOBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.56%

-26.98%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-4.48%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.69%

-7.71%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.53%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-4.79%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.06%

+0.04%

Volatility

GEMD vs. VWOB - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) have volatilities of 1.81% and 1.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMDVWOBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

1.74%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

4.34%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.67%

5.29%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.92%

9.19%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

9.35%

+0.57%

GEMD vs. VWOB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VWOB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEMD vs. VWOB - Dividend Comparison

GEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than VWOB's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEMD
Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
5.65%6.32%5.79%5.70%5.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
5.82%5.92%6.08%5.50%5.30%4.04%4.18%4.58%4.52%4.61%4.71%4.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GEMD and VWOB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GEMD has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to VWOB (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEMD dropped -24.56% vs VWOB's -26.98%.

On 3-year performance, VWOB leads with 9.01% vs 8.14% for GEMD. On fees, VWOB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VWOB has performed better with a 9.01% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWOB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GEMD.

VWOB has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 5.65% for GEMD.

GEMD tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets USD Bond Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VWOB tracks Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Government RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GEMD and 0.15% for VWOB.

VWOB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEMD and VWOB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer