PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEM vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEM vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEM achieves a 26.12% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GEM has underperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 9.79%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.47% annualized return.


GEM

1D
-1.13%
1M
6.24%
YTD
26.12%
6M
29.03%
1Y
50.97%
3Y*
23.48%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.79%

VYMI

1D
0.61%
1M
1.65%
YTD
11.99%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEM vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
26.12%33.43%6.66%11.82%-21.33%-0.19%13.23%17.79%-14.25%36.43%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
11.99%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-1.11%18.43%-12.65%22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GEM and VYMI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2016

0.80

The correlation between GEM and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

GEM vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GEM
VYMI

Financial Services

34.0%
41.9%

Technology

14.1%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.0%
6.5%

Basic Materials

8.7%
6.8%

Industrials

7.5%
6.6%

Healthcare

5.4%
6.6%

Communication Services

4.5%
4.0%

Utilities

4.3%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.3%

Energy

1.3%
9.5%

Financial Services

GEM
34.0%
VYMI
41.9%

Technology

GEM
14.1%
VYMI
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GEM
13.0%
VYMI
6.5%

Basic Materials

GEM
8.7%
VYMI
6.8%

Industrials

GEM
7.5%
VYMI
6.6%

Healthcare

GEM
5.4%
VYMI
6.6%

Communication Services

GEM
4.5%
VYMI
4.0%

Utilities

GEM
4.3%
VYMI
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

GEM
4.2%
VYMI
7.0%

Real Estate

GEM
1.5%
VYMI
1.3%

Energy

GEM
1.3%
VYMI
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEM vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEM
GEM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEM vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEMVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.05

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

12.01

+2.67

GEM vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEM and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEMVYMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.39

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.82

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.62

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.65

-0.13

Drawdowns

GEM vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEM drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEM and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-40.00%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.50%

-10.14%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-12.84%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.43%

-24.05%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.02%

-40.00%

+2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.80%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-6.31%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.57%

+0.91%

Volatility

GEM vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 3.96%. This indicates that GEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

3.96%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.01%

10.74%

+6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

12.94%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

14.84%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

16.87%

+2.16%

GEM vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEM vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

GEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than VYMI's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.83%2.30%2.58%2.97%2.96%3.00%1.63%3.13%2.08%1.81%1.98%0.25%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.42%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEM and VYMI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEM has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to VYMI (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEM dropped -37.02% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 10-year performance, VYMI leads with 10.47% vs 9.79% for GEM. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 10.47% return vs 9.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GEM.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.83% for GEM.

GEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. GEM tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GEM and 0.07% for VYMI.

GEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEM and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer