PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEL vs. DKL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GEL vs. DKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEL achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than DKL's 21.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GEL has underperformed DKL with an annualized return of -1.74%, while DKL has yielded a comparatively higher 18.29% annualized return.


GEL

1D
-1.02%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
1.27%
6M
-1.32%
1Y
-1.63%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
-1.74%

DKL

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.55%
YTD
21.25%
6M
18.30%
1Y
33.58%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
18.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEL vs. DKL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
1.27%61.77%-8.37%19.90%1.05%84.99%-66.17%22.60%-9.18%-32.37%
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP
21.25%17.18%9.40%4.36%14.39%45.88%14.34%21.52%2.07%20.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GEL and DKL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GEL:

$1.89B

DKL:

$2.78B

EPS

GEL:

$0.39

DKL:

$3.17

PE Ratio

GEL:

39.44

DKL:

16.35

PS Ratio

GEL:

1.13

DKL:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEL:

$1.68B

DKL:

$1.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEL:

$281.95M

DKL:

$158.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

GEL:

$437.85M

DKL:

$449.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEL vs. DKL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEL
GEL Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DKL
DKL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DKL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DKL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEL vs. DKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GELDKLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.25

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

2.91

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

8.40

-8.63

GEL vs. DKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEL Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the DKL Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEL and DKL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GELDKLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

1.40

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.45

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.42

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.38

-0.24

Drawdowns

GEL vs. DKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEL drawdown since its inception was -91.63%, which is greater than DKL's maximum drawdown of -82.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEL and DKL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GELDKLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.63%

-82.68%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-11.58%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

-35.26%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.79%

-36.61%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.61%

-82.68%

-6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.80%

-3.61%

-33.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-15.25%

-18.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

4.01%

+3.17%

Volatility

GEL vs. DKL - Volatility Comparison

Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) at 6.99%. This indicates that GEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GELDKLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

6.99%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.81%

20.05%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.63%

24.19%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.32%

31.03%

+10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.20%

43.91%

+7.29%

Dividends

GEL vs. DKL - Dividend Comparison

GEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than DKL's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP
8.66%9.97%10.79%9.56%8.69%8.71%11.19%10.51%10.38%8.80%8.70%6.05%
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
4.46%4.23%6.08%5.18%5.88%5.60%16.10%10.74%11.37%11.87%7.54%6.72%

Financials

GEL vs. DKL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genesis Energy, L.P. and Delek Logistics Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
446.56M
297.47M
(GEL) Total Revenue
(DKL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GEL vs. DKL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genesis Energy, L.P. and Delek Logistics Partners, LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
GEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 446.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DKL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delek Logistics Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 297.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported an operating income of 76.61M and revenue of 446.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

DKL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delek Logistics Partners, LP reported an operating income of 40.01M and revenue of 297.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.

GEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a net income of 19.37M and revenue of 446.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

DKL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delek Logistics Partners, LP reported a net income of 32.35M and revenue of 297.47M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GEL and DKL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEL has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to DKL (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEL dropped -91.63% vs DKL's -82.68%.

DKL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEL and DKL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer