GDYN vs. AVHNY
GDYN (Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.) and AVHNY (Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR) are both stocks. GDYN operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while AVHNY operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past year, GDYN returned -13.11% vs 68.42% for AVHNY. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDYN achieves a -23.70% return, which is significantly lower than AVHNY's 2.08% return.
GDYN
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 13.14%
- 6M
- -16.69%
- YTD
- -23.70%
- 1Y
- -13.11%
- 3Y*
- -11.85%
- 5Y*
- -20.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.06%
AVHNY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 68.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 38.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $13.70M | $11.12M | $15.64M |
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GDYN Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. | -23.70% | -59.40% | 53.80% |
AVHNY Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR | 2.08% | 76.45% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDYN and AVHNY is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
GDYN:
$576.18M
AVHNY:
$8.60B
GDYN:
$0.03
AVHNY:
€3.21
GDYN:
205.48
AVHNY:
7.11
GDYN:
1.39
AVHNY:
0.62
GDYN:
1.12
AVHNY:
1.31
GDYN:
$422.58M
AVHNY:
€11.98B
GDYN:
$146.70M
AVHNY:
€3.73B
GDYN:
$16.71M
AVHNY:
€2.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDYN vs. AVHNY — Risk / Return Rank
GDYN
AVHNY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDYN | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDYN drawdown since its inception was -87.62%, which is greater than AVHNY's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDYN and AVHNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDYN | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.62% | -2.64% | -84.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.21% | 0.00% | -48.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.63% | 0.00% | -83.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.85% | -0.68% | -45.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.55% | 0.00% | +28.55% |
Volatility
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Volatility Comparison
Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) has a higher volatility of 15.58% compared to Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) at 0.00%. This indicates that GDYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVHNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDYN | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.58% | 0.00% | +15.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.73% | 2.05% | +41.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.34% | 65.41% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.77% | 55.48% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.62% | 55.48% | +1.14% |
Dividends
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Dividend Comparison
GDYN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVHNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVHNY Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR | 2.03% | 1.64% |
GDYN Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GDYN vs. AVHNY - Profitability Comparison
GDYN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 39.62M and revenue of 108.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.
AVHNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a gross profit of 409.06M and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
GDYN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28M and revenue of 108.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.
AVHNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported an operating income of 379.86M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
GDYN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 2.85M and revenue of 108.16M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
AVHNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a net income of 316.94M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDYN and AVHNY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDYN has higher volatility (15.58%) compared to AVHNY (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDYN dropped -87.62% vs AVHNY's -2.64%.
AVHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDYN and AVHNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer