GDXW vs. TBIL
GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and TBIL (F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill, while TBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index. GDXW is actively managed, while TBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TBIL.
Performance
GDXW vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -15.08% return, which is significantly lower than TBIL's 1.69% return.
GDXW
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- -11.11%
- YTD
- -15.08%
- 6M
- -20.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXW vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -15.08% | 25.26% |
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 1.69% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXW and TBIL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXW vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GDXW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBIL
GDXW vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXW | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 17.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 195.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 929.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXW vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -43.76%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and TBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXW | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.76% | -0.10% | -43.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.18% | 0.00% | -40.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -0.00% | -15.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
GDXW vs. TBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXW | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.03% | 0.29% | +62.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.03% | 0.32% | +62.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.03% | 0.32% | +62.71% |
GDXW vs. TBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXW vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison
GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.83%, more than TBIL's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 48.83% | 7.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.07% | 5.02% | 5.00% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXW and TBIL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 48.83%, compared with 3.81% for TBIL.
GDXW is categorized as Gold, while TBIL is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.15% for TBIL.
Find the right allocation for GDXW and TBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer