GDXW vs. SLV
GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. GDXW is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
GDXW vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -23.48% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's -21.78% return.
GDXW
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -21.57%
- 6M
- -33.84%
- YTD
- -23.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -20.51%
- 6M
- -39.52%
- YTD
- -21.78%
- 1Y
- 46.44%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
GDXW vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -23.48% | 25.26% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -21.78% | 49.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXW and SLV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXW vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
GDXW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLV
GDXW vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXW | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXW vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXW | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -76.28% | +30.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.10% | -52.28% | +6.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -44.67% | +26.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.22% | — |
Volatility
GDXW vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXW | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.94% | 61.12% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.94% | 36.88% | +25.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.94% | 32.18% | +29.76% |
GDXW vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXW vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.46%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 59.46% | 7.48% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXW and SLV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 59.46%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
GDXW is categorized as Gold, while SLV is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for GDXW and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer