GDXW vs. SGDJ
GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds. GDXW is actively managed, while SGDJ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDJ.
Performance
GDXW vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -15.08% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's -5.38% return.
GDXW
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- -11.11%
- YTD
- -15.08%
- 6M
- -20.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGDJ
- 1D
- -5.01%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- -5.38%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 72.25%
- 3Y*
- 50.80%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
GDXW vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -15.08% | 25.26% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | -5.38% | 29.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXW and SGDJ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXW vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank
GDXW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGDJ
GDXW vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXW | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXW vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -43.76%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and SGDJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXW | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.76% | -59.27% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.18% | -31.02% | -9.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -26.25% | +10.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.18% | — |
Volatility
GDXW vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXW | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.03% | 50.78% | +12.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.03% | 40.87% | +22.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.03% | 40.96% | +22.07% |
GDXW vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXW vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison
GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.83%, more than SGDJ's 8.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 48.83% | 7.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 8.85% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GDXW and SGDJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 48.83%, compared with 8.85% for SGDJ.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.50% for SGDJ.
Find the right allocation for GDXW and SGDJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer