GDXW vs. IGLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill, while IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.

Performance

GDXW vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than IGLD's 1.69% return.

GDXW

• 1D: -4.02%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: -4.89%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGLD

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 1.69%
• 6M: 4.44%
• 1Y: 24.53%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-4.89%	21.25%
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	1.69%	6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and IGLD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

GDXW vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD

IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 28
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 32
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDXW	IGLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.94	-0.49

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and IGLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXW	IGLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.83%	-18.59%	-18.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.99%	-15.16%	-17.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.45%	-5.24%	-8.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDXW	IGLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.39%	23.24%	+38.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.39%	15.17%	+46.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.39%	15.00%	+46.39%

GDXW vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXW vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, more than IGLD's 17.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	39.39%	7.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	17.92%	9.91%	20.81%	7.85%	4.45%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXW and IGLD in my portfolio?

GDXW and IGLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDXW or IGLD?

On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXW or IGLD?

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXW or IGLD?

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 17.92% for IGLD.

What is the main difference between GDXW and IGLD?

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while IGLD is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.85% for IGLD.